|
Venture Capital and
Investing in Business Start-Ups
SECTION 409(A) and its
Regulatory Cousins - What it Means for Private Companies
The IRS recently threw down
the gauntlet and placed pressure on private companies to get
their valuations right at no matter what stage of development
they are. The Service has backed up this gesture by exposing
private companies to substantial tax liabilities and penalties
if they do not.
Since the enactment of
Section 409(A), non-public companies have struggled with how
they should establish that the exercise price of a stock
option or a stock appreciation right (SAR) was determined
reasonably to be fair market value. Up to this point, most
private companies did not worry about valuing their stock very
often, if at all. Private company valuations were needed
usually for an imminent transaction, for an ESOP, or for
estate and gift tax purposes. One could also throw in serious
IPO candidates who obtain a valuation to avoid a "cheap stock"
issue with the SEC.
Many private companies do not
qualify for any of these scenarios; therefore they have not
needed valuations in the past. As a result, companies and
management that issue stock options could be somewhat
unenthusiastic about this development. However, although a
valuation in this situation can appear fairly cumbersome and
superfluous, it's not all bad - just ask auditors.
Auditors have expressed a
desire for this to be done for years. They are cognizant of
this development because valuing stock options is a financial
reporting issue under FAS 123 and they want to know how a
private company established the strike price of its options.
There is some liability risk attributed to auditors when they
sign off on this standard, and a professional valuation
provides them with a level of reasonableness and reassurance
that they desire. Considering this, there is a potential for
tax and financial reporting synergy here.
With a good valuation report
on hand, both issues could be satisfied simultaneously - two
birds with one stone if you will. First, let's examine the
code and regulations driving this change.
Say Hello to the Culprits:
IRC Section 409A requires private companies which award stock
options that have exercise prices below fair market value to
withhold income taxes on these grants. Significant penalties
on non-complying option grants have placed private or closely
held companies under increased pressure to be able to support
and defend the fair market value determinations.
FASB 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, provides alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. FASB 15X
(Working Draft - issued October 21, 2005), Fair Value
Measurements, established a framework for measuring fair value
under a wide variety of accounting pronouncements that require
fair value measurements.
In developing FASB 15X, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board considered the need for
increased consistency and comparability in estimates of fair
value and enhanced disclosures about the estimates.
In most cases, when company
management determines value and option pricing using an
informal, internally generated valuation, the tax burden will
be on the company to prove to the IRS that the fair market
value of the equity is reasonable. In light of the recent
regulatory changes announced over the past year, many private
companies are proactively adopting one of the "presumptive"
stock valuation methods set forth in the proposed regulations.
Procuring a qualified
independent appraisal will cause the burden of proof to shift
to the IRS and may only be rebutted by the IRS if the
application of the method is found to be grossly unreasonable.
Bryce Erickson is Vice President of Dallas-based
Erickson Partners, LLC, who have provided independent,
accurate, defensible opinions,
business valuations & business appraisals for over 30
years. For more information, check out http://www.ericksonpartnersllc.com
see
Venture Capital
or go to
answering service
click for top
|